Live single-page SEO audit
SEO Checker
Check one public page for indexability signals, title and description tags, headings, canonicals, links, images, structured data, mobile essentials, and the server response behind the page.
Check a public page
SEO Checker
Inspect one fetched HTML page for indexability, titles, descriptions, headings, canonicals, links, images, structured data, and mobile essentials.
- Indexability and canonical signals
- Titles, descriptions, headings, and content
- Links, images, and structured data
- HTTPS, response, and mobile essentials
A focused page-level report
What this SEO Checker evaluates
The checker separates signals that affect crawling and indexability from elements that shape how a page is understood and presented. It reports detected evidence, not a generic list copied onto every URL.
HTTP response and HTTPS
See the final status code, redirect count, destination URL, response time, content type, and whether the checked page resolves over HTTPS. A page that does not return a usable response cannot be evaluated like a healthy 200-status page.
Robots and canonical signals
Detect robots meta directives, Googlebot directives, X-Robots-Tag headers, and canonical markup. A noindex directive is surfaced as an important issue; a non-self canonical is presented for confirmation rather than automatically called wrong.
Title and meta description
Review whether one usable title and one description are present, along with their detected text and character length. Length ranges are review prompts only because search engines can truncate, rewrite, or select different text.
H1 and heading hierarchy
Count H1 through H6 headings, inspect the visible outline, and flag skipped levels that may weaken document structure. The tool does not assume that every page template needs the same number of headings.
Visible text and image attributes
Measure words present in the server-returned HTML and identify images with missing alt attributes, empty alt values, or missing dimensions. Empty alt text may be correct for decoration, so it is reported without being treated as an automatic error.
Links, schema, and social metadata
Count crawlable internal and external links, common rel attributes, JSON-LD blocks and types, parse errors, Open Graph tags, Twitter Card tags, hreflang entries, language, charset, and the mobile viewport declaration.
A diagnostic summary, not a ranking prediction
How to interpret the SEO score
The score is calculated only from the weighted checks displayed in the report. A passed check earns its available weight, a warning earns half, and an important error earns none. Informational observations do not change the score. This makes the number reproducible instead of mysterious.
A technically clean page can still be unhelpful, unoriginal, factually weak, poorly matched to search intent, or unsupported by the rest of the site. A lower score can also reflect a deliberate decision, such as a canonical pointing to an equivalent primary URL. Read the evidence and the recommended review before changing the page.
- Start with important findings: Response failures and noindex directives deserve attention before title-length refinements.
- Confirm the page purpose: A product page, article, login screen, and campaign landing page need different content and indexability decisions.
- Check the rendered experience: This tool reads server HTML and cannot judge every JavaScript interaction or visual layout.
- Use Google-specific evidence: Search Console remains necessary for current indexing status, selected canonicals, crawl information, security issues, and manual actions.
Fix access before polishing snippets
Indexability signals deserve the first review
Google must be able to access a useful page and understand which URL is preferred before title or copy refinements can have their intended effect. The checker brings the main page-level signals into one report, but each finding still needs context.
- Confirm the responseUse the final URL and status code to spot errors, redirect chains, or unexpected destinations. A canonical should not be used as a substitute for a broken navigation or redirect plan.
- Read robots directivesA noindex value in HTML or an HTTP header can remove an otherwise accessible page from search results. Keep it only when exclusion is intentional.
- Review the canonicalConfirm that the preferred URL is valid, representative, indexable, and supported by internal links, redirects, and sitemap entries. Cross-domain or alternate canonicals need deliberate verification.
- Check Search ConsoleInspect the URL for Google’s latest crawl, indexing decision, selected canonical, rendered page, and any blocked resources. This is where page-level analysis meets Google-specific evidence.
On-page elements in context
Use titles, headings, and descriptions to clarify the page
Google can use the title element, visible main heading, prominent text, link text, and other sources when generating a title link. That makes consistency more useful than mechanical exact-match repetition. A clear page should identify what it is, who it serves, and what the reader can do next.
Describe the page, not a keyword list
Keep one meaningful title in the head. Put the primary subject early when it reads naturally, distinguish the page from similar URLs, and avoid boilerplate that makes every title look the same.
Make the visible purpose unmistakable
An H1 should orient the reader when the page loads. Align it with the title without forcing identical wording, then use lower-level headings to express real sections and subtopics.
Earn the click with an accurate summary
A meta description can influence the displayed snippet, but it is not guaranteed to appear. Summarize the specific value of this page instead of repeating the title or making claims the content cannot support.
Connect the page to a useful path
Descriptive internal links help readers discover supporting information and help crawlers find related URLs. Link because the destination advances the task, not simply to hit a target count.
Describe information and silence decoration
Useful alt text conveys the purpose of an informative image in context. Decorative images generally need an empty alt attribute, which is why this checker distinguishes an empty value from a missing attribute.
Represent visible facts accurately
Valid JSON is only the first test. Markup must use an appropriate type, include required properties where relevant, and match information users can actually see on the page.
From automated evidence to a real decision
A practical page-review workflow
Run the checker on the exact canonical page, then combine its findings with rendering, search, analytics, and editorial evidence. The strongest fixes solve an observed problem for both discovery and the user experience.
Open source and response headers for important findings. A plugin, CDN, template, or redirect rule may generate the final directive somewhere other than the page editor.
Test desktop and mobile layouts, interactive controls, navigation, forms, images, and content added by JavaScript. Confirm that visible content matches what the server response suggests.
Review the current result types and genuinely useful competing pages. Identify missing evidence, examples, decisions, or functionality rather than copying their headings.
Record the change, request recrawling when appropriate, and monitor Search Console impressions, queries, indexing, selected canonical, clicks, and the page’s own conversions.
Transparent method and boundaries
What this checker can and cannot establish
The WordPress plugin performs a safe public HTTP request, limits redirects and response size, parses the returned HTML with a structured DOM parser, and reports only what it detects. It does not invent backlinks, rankings, traffic, Core Web Vitals, or Google indexing data.
One URL, not a whole crawl
The report does not discover duplicate pages, orphan URLs, sitewide redirect patterns, crawl depth, or every internal link. Use a crawler and Search Console for site-level diagnosis.
Server HTML, not full rendering
Client-side content may be absent. If a canonical, link, heading, or schema block appears only after JavaScript runs, compare the report with rendered HTML and Google’s inspection tools.
No Google index confirmation
Absence of noindex does not guarantee inclusion. Google may still choose another canonical, find the content low value, fail to crawl it recently, or exclude it for other reasons.
No link or traffic database
This module reviews the fetched page itself. Use the separate Backlink Checker, Domain Authority Checker, Website Traffic Checker, and Keyword Rank Checker for their distinct datasets.
No universal length rules
Title and description lengths are prompts for review. Search presentation varies by query and device, while the right amount of page content depends on the task.
No automated quality verdict
A parser cannot verify originality, expertise, factual accuracy, first-hand experience, brand trust, or whether the page fully solves the reader’s problem.
Primary method references
- Google Search Central: SEO Starter Guide
- Google Search Central: influencing title links
- Google Search Central: canonical URL signals
- Google Search Central: robots meta and X-Robots-Tag
- Google Search Central: mobile-first indexing guidance
These references explain search-platform behavior. They do not endorse EduGuestPost, this scoring model, or any ranking outcome.
From page fixes to relevant promotion
Choose publishers yourself or ask us to research them
Once the target page is technically accessible and genuinely useful, decide how publisher research should work. The two paths are deliberately separate so you can choose the level of control your campaign needs.
- Buy Guest Posts: Browse and compare available publisher opportunities yourself in the Guest Post Publisher Marketplace.
- Blogger Outreach: Ask EduGuestPost to research publishers, qualify prospects, send personalized pitches, manage follow-ups, and coordinate accepted opportunities through Blogger Outreach Services.
- Confirmed order terms: Approved placements retain the dofollow guest post and Google indexing guarantee specified for the order.
Publisher inventory
Digital Marketing Publisher Opportunities
Compare marketing-focused publisher opportunities for a useful SEO or marketing resource. Review audience fit and current terms before requesting a placement; the checker score does not evaluate publisher quality.
Publisher names stay private. Compare the TLD, niche, market, authority, traffic, timing, and price, then submit the reference codes you want reviewed. We send the exact domains privately after checking fit and availability. A small number of .edu or DA90+ records may appear as public examples.
Before you approve a placement: this inventory is compiled from supplier data. EduGuestPost reconfirms current availability, price, metrics, editorial requirements, and publisher acceptance. Confirmed guest post orders include a dofollow link and indexing guarantee under the review period and remedy written into the approved order. Rankings, traffic, leads, sales, and authority-score increases are not guaranteed.
Campaign brief builder
Tell us what you are trying to place
Save a short brief before selecting publishers. It will be added to the order form with your chosen sites, so the quote can be reviewed faster.
Supplier-marked and Google News labels reflect imported inventory fields, not an independent endorsement. We recheck the final shortlist before you approve it.
408 matching publisher options. Showing first 10.
Displayed prices are 4-8% below supplied list prices and remain subject to availability confirmation.
| Publisher option | Niche | Market | Authority | Traffic | Price | Timing | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Private publisher (.pl)Ref EGP-F8-CE6F698EPrivate inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, Poland, DA 38, DR 34. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & AdvertisingGoogle News | Poland Polish | DA 38 DR 34 | 4.1M | $333.564.44% below supplied list | Often under 48h | |
| Private publisher (.com)Ref EGP-5LA-52A75590Private inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, India, DA 34, DR 26. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & Advertising | India English | DA 34 DR 26 | 679.4K | $301.046.04% below supplied list | Confirm timing | |
| Private publisher (.pl)Ref EGP-3UR-55306C60Private inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, Poland, DA 44, DR 54. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & Advertising | Poland Polish | DA 44 DR 54 | 368.6K | $1,118.187.95% below supplied list | Confirm timing | |
| Private publisher (.com)Ref EGP-33Y-A267AE8CPrivate inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, India, DA 68, DR 75. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & Advertising | India English | DA 68 DR 75 | 261.1K | $757.105.95% below supplied list | Confirm timing | |
| Private publisher (.co)Ref EGP-4Q8-3CE95659Private inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, United States, DA 32, DR 72. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & AdvertisingSupplier-marked | United States English | DA 32 DR 72 | 204.5K | $479.147.00% below supplied list | Confirm timing | |
| Private publisher (.pl)Ref EGP-2QN-0A357A09Private inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, Poland, DA 27, DR 40. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & Advertising | Poland Polish | DA 27 DR 40 | 106.3K | $244.514.96% below supplied list | Confirm timing | |
| Private publisher (.tools)Ref EGP-4J-AA60118DPrivate inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, India, DA 31, DR 42. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & AdvertisingSupplier-marked | India English | DA 31 DR 42 | 91.9K | $193.527.54% below supplied list | Confirm timing | |
| Private publisher (.com)Ref EGP-6CF-092FB00EPrivate inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, United States, DA 54, DR 58. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & AdvertisingSupplier-marked | United States English | DA 54 DR 58 | 87.7K | $442.345.26% below supplied list | Confirm timing | |
| Private publisher (.com)Ref EGP-43C-E5D48101Private inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, United States, DA 36, DR 49. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & AdvertisingSupplier-marked | United States English | DA 36 DR 49 | 62K | $449.296.98% below supplied list | Confirm timing | |
| Private publisher (.co.uk)Ref EGP-5Q5-95BB1097Private inventory record: Digital Marketing & Advertising, United Kingdom, DA 43, DR 60. Updated Jul 3, 2026; identity, current metrics, and editorial terms are confirmed after request. | Digital Marketing & AdvertisingSupplier-marked | United Kingdom English | DA 43 DR 60 | 55.4K | $44.857.14% below supplied list | Confirm timing |
Questions about the report
SEO Checker FAQs
What does this SEO Checker inspect?
It fetches one public HTML page and checks server response, indexability directives, canonical markup, title and description tags, headings, links, images, structured data, social metadata, language, charset, and mobile viewport markup.
Is the diagnostic score a Google score?
No. The score is a transparent summary of the checks this tool can observe in one fetched HTML response. Google does not publish or use this score, and a higher result does not guarantee indexing or rankings.
Can this tool confirm that Google indexed a page?
No. It can detect technical signals that may permit or discourage indexing, but only Google Search Console and Google search results can provide current Google-specific indexing evidence.
Does the checker render JavaScript?
No. It analyzes the server-returned HTML. Content, links, canonicals, or structured data added only after client-side JavaScript runs may not appear in this report.
Does it measure Core Web Vitals?
No. Response time is measured only for this server request. Core Web Vitals require field or laboratory performance data and should be reviewed separately.
Why can two SEO tools report different issues?
Tools use different crawlers, rendering methods, thresholds, datasets, and scoring models. Treat automated findings as evidence to investigate, then confirm important issues in the page source, browser, Search Console, and analytics.
Request a reviewed campaign
Turn the audit into a page and publisher brief
Share the target URL, audience, market, topic, and the findings that matter. EduGuestPost can use that context when reviewing publisher fit, current availability, placement terms, and the campaign path you approve.
- Target-page purpose and audience review
- Publisher relevance and current visibility checks
- Dofollow guest post placement under approved terms
- Google indexing guarantee for the confirmed placement
Submitting this form requests research and a quote. It does not authorize payment or publication.
Include the page URL, priority market, topic, and any publishers or competitors already under review.